Tool comparison, updated August 2026

Choosing a Medical Chronology Tool for Your Firm

Nine tools dominate this category, and they differ on the two things that decide the purchase: whether you can see pricing without a sales call, and how much of the review work still lands on your staff. This comparison covers both, plus the alternative every software roundup skips: not buying software at all.

The four questions that decide this purchase

Pricing model, not price

Per page, per seat, or platform contract. A cheap per-page rate at high volume can beat a contract; a contract can beat per-seat at scale. Model the cost per finished chronology at YOUR volume.

Who verifies the output

Every tool expects your staff to verify entries against cited pages before the chronology is used. Budget those hours; they are the hidden line item in every quote.

PHI handling in writing

SOC 2 audit, HIPAA business associate agreement, and a no-training-on-your-data commitment. Get all three before the first upload.

Page citations that survive deposition

A chronology entry without a pin cite to the record set is an assertion, not evidence. Confirm the tool cites to your Bates numbering, not its own internal page count.

The nine tools attorneys shortlist

What each one is, how it prices, and the firm it fits.

CaseFleet

Annotation-driven: your team reviews the records and highlights facts, and the highlights build the chronology and a visual timeline. Full-text search covers scanned and handwritten pages.

Pricing:
Subscription; 14-day free trial, no credit card
Workflow:
You do the review in-tool
Best for:
Firms that want a human eye on every entry, including med-mal and insurance defense teams.

EvenUp MedChrons

Interactive chronologies inside the EvenUp platform, generated with AI plus human review, sold alongside its demand package products.

Pricing:
Not published; sales-led, typically annual contracts
Workflow:
Generated for you, platform contract
Best for:
High-volume plaintiff firms already evaluating the full EvenUp platform.

Supio

Chronologies as part of a broader plaintiff AI platform with demand letters, case economics, and mass tort support. SOC 2 Type II certified, HIPAA compliant.

Pricing:
Not published; book a demo
Workflow:
Generated for you, platform contract
Best for:
Larger firms that want chronologies bundled with firm-level analytics.

Superinsight

Automated medical record review and chronology generation, pitched on privacy: HIPAA-compliant processing with no human reviewers touching the records.

Pricing:
Not published; free trial and demo offered
Workflow:
Generated for you
Best for:
Firms prioritizing hands-off processing of large record sets.

Wisedocs

Medical record indexing, sorting, and chronologies, serving insurance claims and legal teams.

Pricing:
Not published; sales-led
Workflow:
Generated for you
Best for:
Claims-side and defense workflows where record intake volume is the problem.

Legalyze

AI chronologies from uploaded medical records, marketed on review speed.

Pricing:
Custom, sized to team and case volume; demo-led
Workflow:
Generated for you
Best for:
Small firms that want a simple upload-and-generate workflow.

CaseMark

Date-ordered chronologies with page citations covering visits, diagnoses, treatments, medications, and test results, generated from uploaded records.

Pricing:
$25 per summary plus $0.10 per source page
Workflow:
You upload, it generates, you verify
Best for:
Record-heavy litigation teams that want published per-document pricing without a demo.

Filevine MedChron

A chronology tool native to the Filevine case management platform.

Pricing:
Bundled with Filevine; quote-based
Workflow:
Generated inside your case management system
Best for:
Firms already running Filevine.

InPractice

Self-serve chronology software with OCR search and filterable output, priced per page with no subscription.

Pricing:
From $0.05 per page, no subscription
Workflow:
You upload, it generates, you verify
Best for:
Low-volume firms that want to pay only for pages processed.

Vendor details reflect publicly listed information as of August 2026 and may change. Confirm current pricing and terms on each vendor's site.

The option software roundups never mention

Every tool above still needs your staff to run it. The alternative is ordering the chronology itself: finished, page-cited, and flat-priced per document.

Buying software means

  • A subscription, contract, or per-page bill that runs whether cases are heavy or light
  • Staff hours to upload, review, and verify every generated entry
  • Implementation, training, and one more login to manage
  • Output quality that depends on how well your team drives the tool

Ordering the document means

  • A flat per-document price, only when you have a matter
  • You send the record set; a finished, page-cited chronology comes back
  • Treatment gaps, pre-existing conditions, and billing reconciliation flagged for you
  • Nothing to implement, train on, or supervise

Common questions

What firms ask before they commit to a chronology workflow.

Flat per-document pricing

Test with one real case

Send one record set and compare the finished chronology against what your current workflow produces. No contract, no seats, no implementation: just the document, page-cited and ready to use.