For licensed attorneys and law firms only
Medical record reviews that tell you what the file actually supports
Medical record review services analyze a litigation record set and return a findings memo answering one question: what do these records actually support? The memo covers diagnosis history, causation language, prior injuries and claims, and treatment compliance, each finding cited to the page, so counsel can value, plead, or decline a case on evidence rather than intake optimism.
Where a chronology maps the whole timeline, a record review is a focused screen: the entries that prove causation, the entries an adjuster will weaponize, and nothing in between. Every engagement is quoted flat from the page count before work starts. No hourly meter, no per-page surprise on the invoice, no minimum volume.
What medical record review for attorneys delivers
The deliverable is a findings memo built for how counsel actually uses records: to value the claim, anticipate the defense, and decide what to concede before opposing counsel makes you. Every finding cites the exact pages in the Bates-stamped or paginated set, so any line can be verified in seconds.
Diagnosis history and causation language
Every diagnosis in sequence, with the treating providers' own causation statements quoted and cited. The words a physician chose in the chart carry more settlement weight than anything a demand letter can assert.
Adverse facts flagged privately for counsel
Prior injuries, prior claims, degenerative findings, missed appointments, and inconsistent pain reports are surfaced in a separate section for your eyes, not papered over. You should meet the bad facts in our memo, not in the defense IME report.
Medication and treatment compliance
Fills, refill gaps, discontinued therapies, and against-medical-advice entries tracked, because compliance is the first place an adjuster looks for a mitigation argument.
IME and adjuster leverage points
The specific entries a defense medical examiner or claims adjuster will build their position on, identified in advance so your responses are drafted before the argument is made.
Medical chart review services by matter type
Chart review is not one product. The question the memo must answer changes with the matter, so scope is set by case type at intake.
Personal injury
Causation and valuation: does the objective evidence connect the incident to the injury, and what do the records let you credibly demand? The memo feeds directly into demand letter drafting on the same record set, so the demand asserts only what the chart can back.
Medical malpractice standard-of-care screens
A pre-expert screen mapping the documented course of care against the expected one: departures, documentation gaps, late entries, and timeline inconsistencies flagged for expert attention. You spend expert-witness budget only on files that survive the screen.
Workers compensation
Work-relatedness language, restriction and MMI entries, and prior-condition findings isolated, so the compensability fight is fought on the pages that decide it.
Mass tort intake screening
High-volume criteria screens: exposure or usage confirmation, qualifying diagnosis, and disqualifying history per claimant, in a consistent memo format your intake team can sort on. Flat per-file pricing makes screening costs a line item you can model across the docket.
Paralegal medical records review, without burning paralegal hours
In most firms, records review lands on a paralegal by default, and the economics are quietly terrible: a 1,500-page set consumes days of billable-capacity time on first-pass reading, and the reviewer is often learning the medicine while doing it. The work is real, but it is the wrong altitude for staff who should be managing discovery, clients, and deadlines.
The working split that firms settle into: we do the extraction and first-level analysis and deliver the cited findings memo, your paralegal verifies the flagged pages against the source set and routes the memo into the case file. First-pass review of a large set becomes a fixed cost known at intake instead of an open-ended drain on staff hours, and your team touches only the pages that matter. It is the same trade firms make with outsourced deposition transcription: keep judgment in-house, send volume out.
How to choose among medical record review companies
The vendor field splits three ways. Physician-review shops staff board-certified doctors and make sense when you need a medical opinion on the merits, at a physician price. AI platforms are fast and cheap per page but return extraction, not judgment: no one has decided whether a finding helps or hurts you. Litigation-support vendors like us sit between: legal writers using AI-assisted extraction with human review, producing a memo organized around your legal questions rather than the medicine for its own sake.
Whichever category fits the matter, apply the same four screens. Pricing: a fixed number before work starts, not an hourly estimate that floats. Citations: every finding traceable to a page, or the memo cannot survive contact with opposing counsel. Adverse-fact handling: a vendor that only reports the good news is selling confirmation, not review. Confidentiality: secure transfer, a Business Associate Agreement on request, and purge on instruction. Our answers to all four are on this page; record review is one lane of the full litigation support menu.
Record review or a medical chronology: which does your case need?
They answer different questions. A chronology is the full dated, page-cited timeline of every medically significant event in the record set: the backbone of a demand package, deposition outline, or mediation statement. A record review is a focused findings memo: what the records support, what they undermine, and where the leverage sits. The chronology is comprehensive by design; the review is selective by design.
In practice the choice tracks the case stage. At intake or during early valuation, order the review: it is faster, cheaper, and tells you whether the file deserves more investment. Once the case is moving toward demand, deposition, or mediation, order the page-cited medical chronology built on the same records, or take both as a package quoted together at intake. When treatment is ongoing and specials are still accruing, the review also pairs with a letter of protection strategy so the record you eventually summarize is the record you wanted to build.
All deliverables are attorney work-product support prepared for licensed counsel: we never contact your client, providers, insurers, or opposing parties, and nothing we prepare is filed or served by us. Records never travel by email attachment: intake and delivery both run through the encrypted portal, only the reviewer assigned to the matter can open the file, a Business Associate Agreement is executed where your workflow requires one, and the source set is deleted the moment you close the engagement. Legal Tank is not a law firm and does not provide legal or medical opinions.
Get a flat record review quote from your page count
Tell us the matter type and rough record volume. You'll get the per-document rate card and turnaround, usually within one business day. Part of the law firm drafting program.
Medical record review services FAQ
What do the best medical record review services include?
A complete review delivers a findings memo, not a stack of highlighted PDFs: diagnosis history in order, causation language quoted with page citations, prior injuries and prior claims surfaced, medication and treatment compliance tracked, and the specific entries an adjuster or defense IME will lean on. The strongest vendors also flag the facts that hurt your case privately for counsel, because a review that only confirms your theory fails the first time it meets a defense exhibit.
How much do medical record review services cost?
Most medical record review companies bill hourly or per page against an open-ended estimate, so the total is unknowable until the invoice arrives. We quote one flat per-document price from your page count before work starts, and that figure does not move once the review begins. Send the rough record volume through the intake form and the current rate card comes back with your quote, usually within one business day.
Is AI medical record review reliable for litigation?
AI extraction is excellent at the mechanical layer: it does not miss a date, a charge, or a medication change across two thousand pages. It is not reliable alone, because relevance is a legal judgment: whether a degenerative finding undermines causation or a treatment gap is explainable depends on your theory of the case. Our reviews pair AI-assisted extraction with human legal-writer review, so every finding in the memo has been read by a person before you rely on it.
Do I need a medical record review service near me?
No. Records arrive and deliverables return through a secure portal, the review is desk work rather than an in-person examination, and a Business Associate Agreement governs handling wherever your firm sits. Geography matters for an IME; for record review it only narrows your vendor pool. What should be local is your control: you direct scope, you receive the adverse-fact flags, and the record set is deleted on your timetable.
Can a medical record review support a lawsuit against a provider?
Yes, as a screening layer. A standard-of-care screen maps what the records show against the expected course of treatment and flags departures, documentation gaps, and altered or late entries worth expert attention, so you spend expert-witness budget only on files that survive the screen. The memo is attorney work-product support prepared for counsel; it is not an expert opinion and we do not testify.