Litigation Support

Litigation Support Services for Trial Attorneys

Written discovery, e-discovery first-pass review, deposition summaries, summary judgment support, and trial-prep binders.

Our litigation support services run the FRCP case lifecycle workstreams that sit between trial-attorney strategy calls. Discovery drafted to local civil-rule numerical limits, e-discovery first-pass review on Relativity, Everlaw, or Reveal, deposition summaries with page-line indices and exhibit cross-references, and trial-prep binders built on the judge's standing orders. Trial attorney owns the Rule 5.3 review and signs every filing.

Reviewed by Rachel Torres, Regulatory Compliance ManagerJ.D., Georgetown, CIPP/US
Litigation support services hero illustration showing the federal civil case lifecycle from pleading through trial prep with e-discovery review and deposition summaries
Relativity + Everlaw Benches
E-discovery platform access sits inside our bench. No new platform seats stood up for the engagement.
Senior Drafter + Peer Review
Senior litigation-support drafter on every workstream. Peer review pass before any deliverable leaves the portal.
Protective-Order-Aware Portal
SOC-2 Type II matter portal honors the case's protective-order confidentiality designations end to end.
FRCP + State Civil Rules
Federal and all 50 state benches. Local civil rules and judge standing orders enforced on every deliverable.
Workstream Catalog

Eight Workstreams That Carry the Case From Pleading to Trial

Discovery support services, deposition summary services, e-discovery support, and trial preparation support are bundled below into the eight workstreams that move a civil case through its lifecycle. Engage one workstream as a project, a stack as a sprint, or the full lifecycle as a case retainer.

Pleading & Motion Practice

Complaint drafting, answer drafting, Rule 12 motion practice (12(b)(6), 12(b)(1), 12(c)), and replies. Pleadings drafted to the controlling jurisdiction's Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard and local rule formatting.

Written Discovery

Interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, and the corresponding objections and responses. Drafted to the local civil rules' numerical limits and the protective order's confidentiality designations.

E-Discovery First-Pass Review

First-level relevance review, privilege flagging, redaction prep, and production-log maintenance on Relativity, Everlaw, or Reveal. Privilege calls escalate to the trial attorney; first-pass relevance moves through the bench.

Deposition Summaries

Page-line summary indices with exhibit cross-references and issue tags. Same-day turnaround available on transcripts received before 3 PM ET for trial-prep sprints.

Summary Judgment Support

Statement of facts with record citations, brief support, expert-designation drafting, and Daubert-motion support. Drafted to the controlling jurisdiction's Rule 56 standard and the judge's individual rules.

Trial Prep & Exhibit Index

Pretrial order drafting, exhibit index construction with deposition cross-references, jury-instruction research and drafting, witness binders, and the trial-evidence binder for the trial attorney's lectern.

Cite-Check & Brief Support

Citation passes on briefs and motions, Bluebook conformance, record-citation verification, and table-of-authorities drafting. Pairs with our research bench for cases that need new authority research alongside the cite check.

E-Filing Preparation

PACER/CM-ECF e-filing packets, state-court ECF packets, courtesy-copy mechanics, and judge-specific standing-order conformance. Filing signature stays with the trial attorney; we prepare the packet.

FRCP Case Lifecycle

Federal Civil Case Lifecycle and the FRCP Rule Anchors

Our litigation-support bench maps every workstream to the FRCP rule that controls it. The table below is the case lifecycle our drafters work from on federal civil matters; state-court engagements substitute the state civil rules, and our bench carries the local-rule research separately.

Lifecycle StageWorkstreams Routed to the BenchRule Anchor
Rule 7 / Rule 8 pleading stageComplaint research and drafting; answer with Rule 12 responses; Rule 12(b)(6) motion practice; Rule 15 amended pleadings.FRCP 7, 8, 12, 15
Rule 26(f) discovery planRule 26(a) initial-disclosure drafting; Rule 26(f) conference outline; protective-order drafting; ESI-protocol drafting.FRCP 26
Written discoveryInterrogatories (limit 25 absent leave); RFP and RFA drafting; objections and responses; Rule 34 production logs.FRCP 33, 34, 36
E-discovery productionFirst-pass relevance review; privilege log drafting; redaction prep; load-file QC on Relativity / Everlaw / Reveal.FRCP 26(b), 34(b), 37(e)
DepositionsPre-deposition outline; exhibit binder; page-line summary; deposition-by-deposition issue tag log.FRCP 30, 32
Summary judgmentStatement of undisputed facts; brief support with record cites; response statement of facts; expert and Daubert support.FRCP 56, FRE 702
Pretrial and trialPretrial order drafting; motions in limine; jury instructions; exhibit index; trial-evidence binder; verdict-form drafting.FRCP 16(e), 50, 51

What our bench does not do

Our litigation-support drafters do not appear in court, do not take depositions, do not sign filings, do not make privilege calls on flagged documents, and do not communicate with the underlying client. Those touchpoints stay with the trial attorney under Rule 5.3 because they require the licensed bar admission and attorney-client relationship the engagement does not transfer.

Platform Stack

E-Discovery and Case-Management Platform Access on the Bench

Our litigation-support bench operates on the platforms the cases actually run on. E-discovery review goes through Relativity, Everlaw, or Reveal depending on the engaging firm's existing workspace; transcript management and deposition summaries run through TextMap and LiveNote with native exports from the Veritext or court-reporter file; case management and exhibit indices run through CaseFleet, NetDocuments, or iManage; and e-filing routes through PACER/CM-ECF for federal matters or the controlling state ECF system.

Database access sits inside the Legal Tank bench, which means the engaging firm does not stand up new platform seats for the engagement, the case file does not live on a platform outside the matter portal, and the protective order's confidentiality designations are mapped to the platform's access controls at intake. Production logs, privilege logs, and load-file QC records all return to the engaging firm at engagement close.

For cases that need new authority research alongside the cite-checking pass, our research bench pairs directly with the litigation-support engagement. Legal research services are quoted as an add-on workstream at intake and the same named drafter coordinates across both.

Engagement Flow

How a Litigation Support Engagement Runs From Intake to Filing

Six-step engagement flow runs whether the workstream is a single discovery response, a deposition-summary sprint, or a full case-lifecycle retainer.

  1. 1

    Case intake

    Send the case caption, controlling jurisdiction, operative deadlines, and the workstream you need on the docket. We return scope in one business day.

  2. 2

    Conflicts + protective-order check

    We run the conflicts ledger against the parties and counsel, and confirm the protective order's confidentiality designations before any source material moves.

  3. 3

    Engagement NDA + portal

    Matter-specific engagement NDA executed; SOC-2 Type II matter portal provisioned with named-user access for the assigned drafter and the trial attorney.

  4. 4

    Drafter assignment

    We assign a senior litigation-support drafter on the workstream lane that fits (discovery, e-discovery review, deposition summary, motion practice, trial prep) plus a peer reviewer.

  5. 5

    Drafting + peer review pass

    Workstream runs end-to-end inside the portal: drafting on the controlling jurisdiction's local rules, peer review pass, and the deliverable returns through the portal.

  6. 6

    Returned for trial-attorney review

    Trial attorney owns the Rule 5.3 review, signs every pleading, makes the privilege call on every flagged document, and files the packet on the court docket.

Engagements

What Trial Attorneys Say After the Discovery Sprint Settles

Five-star feedback from commercial litigators, solo practitioners, employment-litigation boutiques, and insurance-defense firms that routed litigation-support workstreams through our bench on a single matter, a sprint, or a multi-month case retainer.

Eleven-attorney commercial litigation firm, four active cases in heavy discovery, and our paralegal bench was tapped out on the e-discovery review for the lead case. Engaged Legal Tank on a per-matter litigation-support retainer: first-pass review on Relativity, privilege flagging escalating to our lead partner, and weekly production logs. Three weeks in we cleared the backlog without pulling associates off depositions, and the privilege calls held up on a Rule 37 motion brought by the opposing side.

Henrietta V.
Minneapolis · Verified client
E-Discovery First-Pass Review

Solo personal-injury practice, a complex products case with eight depositions taken in two weeks, and a trial date six weeks out. Their deposition-summary bench turned around page-line summaries with exhibit cross-references on a same-day cadence for the entire deposition stack, then built the trial exhibit index against those summaries. I walked into voir dire with the binder, the witness file, and the deposition page-line index already cross-referenced. Verdict came back in our favor.

Tobias H.
Sacramento · Verified client
Deposition Summary + Trial Prep Sprint

Mid-size employment-litigation boutique, summary-judgment season landed three motions across three cases at once. Their litigation-support drafter built the statements of undisputed fact with record citations on all three, plus first drafts of the brief support sections. Our partners did the final argument-and-strategy pass on each brief, signed under our own firm letterhead, and we got rulings in our favor on two of the three motions. Cleared the SJ season without burning associate hours we needed on trial prep.

Anastasia M.
Denver · Verified client
Summary Judgment Support Sprint

Regional insurance-defense firm with a heavy state-court civil docket and a permanent demand for discovery responses on tight statutory clocks. Standing litigation-support retainer with Legal Tank covers interrogatories, RFP responses, and RFA responses across the docket. Their drafter pulls the privilege log against the firm's running privilege ledger, and our partner reviews and signs every response. Throughput is up roughly fifty percent on written discovery without adding headcount.

Cornelius B.
Birmingham · Verified client
Standing Discovery-Response Retainer
Rule 5.3 & Signature

Trial Attorney Signs Every Pleading; We Run the Workstream

Every litigation-support engagement is structured so the trial attorney is the supervising attorney of record under ABA Model Rule 5.3. Our drafter prepares the work product, we run a peer review pass, and the deliverable returns through the matter portal for the trial attorney's Rule 5.3 review and signature. Privilege calls on flagged documents escalate to the trial attorney rather than being made on the bench, and no filing reaches the court docket without the trial attorney's bar number on the signature block.

Trial attorney is the signer of record

Pleadings, motions, discovery responses, expert designations, and trial-evidence packets all carry the trial attorney's signature and bar number. Our drafter prepares the deliverable; the trial attorney owns the strategy and the signature.

Senior drafter + peer review pass

Every workstream runs a senior litigation-support drafter plus a peer reviewer who runs the local-rule and citation conformance pass before the deliverable leaves the portal. The trial attorney still owns the Rule 5.3 review on delivery.

What Legal Tank Does · What You Sign

Legal Tank

  • Drafts discovery, motions, deposition summaries, and trial-prep deliverables.
  • Runs first-pass e-discovery relevance review with privilege flagging.
  • Operates the platform stack inside our bench; protective-order designations honored.
  • Prepares e-filing packets to local-rule and judge-standing-order conformance.

Trial Attorney

  • Owns the case strategy, the privilege calls, and the witness preparation.
  • Reviews every deliverable on return and signs every pleading on its own letterhead.
  • Takes depositions, appears in court, and handles oral argument.
  • Holds the attorney-client relationship with the underlying client.
Content Reviewed By
Rachel Torres, Regulatory Compliance Manager at Legal Tank
Rachel Torres
Regulatory Compliance Manager
J.D., Georgetown, CIPP/US
Marcus Williams, Senior Legal Content Writer at Legal Tank
Marcus Williams
Senior Legal Content Writer
B.A. English, Howard University, ABA-Approved Paralegal
Jessica Henwick, Editor-in-Chief & Legal Content Director at Legal Tank
Jessica Henwick
Editor-in-Chief & Legal Content Director
B.A. Legal Studies, UC Berkeley, NALA CP

For trial-level briefs only, see legal brief writing services. For ongoing paralegal capacity inside a firm, see paralegal services. For broader workstream routing, see outsource legal services.

FAQ

Questions Trial Attorneys Ask About Litigation Support

What does a litigation support specialist do?
A litigation support specialist runs the supporting workstreams that move a federal or state civil case from pleading to trial: drafting and responding to written discovery, running first-pass review on the electronic discovery production, summarizing deposition transcripts with page-line indices and exhibit cross-references, building exhibit indices, preparing trial binders, and handling the e-filing mechanics on every pleading the trial attorney signs. The trial attorney owns the strategy, signs every filing, and appears in court. The litigation-support specialist runs the workflow underneath.
What is included in litigation support?
Litigation support covers the entire repeatable case-lifecycle workflow that sits between trial-attorney strategy decisions: complaint and answer drafting, Rule 12 motion practice, Rule 26 disclosures and discovery plan drafting, written discovery (interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, and responses), e-discovery first-pass review with privilege flagging and production logs, deposition outlines and post-deposition summaries, summary-judgment support (statement of facts, brief support, expert designations), pretrial-order drafting, exhibit indices, jury-instruction research, and the trial binder.
How much do litigation support services cost?
Litigation support engagements are quoted per workstream after a short intake covering the case caption, the controlling jurisdiction, the operative deadlines (Rule 26 disclosure date, discovery cut-off, trial date), and the volume of source material on each workstream. The quote returns within one business day with the assigned senior litigation-support drafter and the workstream scope (single matter, ongoing case retainer, trial-prep sprint). Send the case posture through our quote form and we return scope and timeline same business day on intakes received before 5 PM ET.
What is the difference between paralegal and litigation support?
Litigation paralegals are credentialed paralegals (NALA CP, NFPA RP) who carry the full paralegal workflow inside a single firm, often across practice areas. Litigation-support specialists are case-lifecycle workstream specialists who plug into the litigation docket as outside capacity: discovery drafting, e-discovery review, deposition summaries, trial-prep stack. Legal Tank offers both as separate engagement structures. See paralegal services for ongoing in-firm paralegal capacity and this page for case-lifecycle workstream support.
What software is used for litigation support?
The platform stack our litigation-support bench operates on covers e-discovery review (Relativity, Everlaw, Reveal), transcript management and deposition summary (TextMap, LiveNote, Veritext-export workflows), case-management and exhibit-index tools (CaseFleet, NetDocuments, iManage), and federal and state e-filing portals (PACER/CM-ECF, state court ECF systems). Database access sits inside our bench, which means the engaging firm does not stand up new platform seats for the engagement and the case file never lives on a platform outside the matter portal.
Ready for the Sprint

Route Your Next Workstream to Our Bench

Send the case caption, jurisdiction, and the operative deadline through our quote form. We return scope and the named drafter in one business day.

Quotes return same business day on intakes received before 5 PM ET