The Best EvenUp Alternatives for Injury Firms
EvenUp is the biggest name in AI demand packages, and it is also sales-led with unpublished pricing. The real alternatives split three ways: rival AI platforms (Supio, Eve), software you run yourself (CaseFleet, Filevine, InPractice), and done-for-you drafting that skips software entirely. Here is how all six compare.
Pricing you cannot see
EvenUp and its closest rivals quote through sales calls, usually as annual contracts. A firm sending a handful of demands a month cannot tell in advance whether the math works.
Paying for the whole platform
The big platforms bundle demands with intake, negotiation, analytics, and litigation modules. If you only need chronologies and demand letters, the bundle prices in features you will not use.
Software still needs your staff
Every platform needs someone at your firm to upload records, review output, and verify citations before anything goes out the door. The tool is faster than manual drafting, but it is not hands-off.
Six alternatives, one honest rubric
For each option: what it actually is, whether you can see the price before a sales call, and the firm it fits best.
Supio
Sales call for pricingAI platform for plaintiff firms: medical chronologies, demand letters, case economics, litigation drafting, and firm-level analytics, with mass tort support.
- Pricing:
- Not published; book a demo for a quote
- Best for:
- Larger plaintiff firms that want an EvenUp-scale platform and are comfortable with a sales-led purchase. SOC 2 Type II certified and HIPAA compliant.
Eve
Sales call for pricingAI agents across the plaintiff workflow: intake, medical overview, demand drafting, and discovery responses.
- Pricing:
- Not published; sales-led
- Best for:
- Firms that want automation across the whole case lifecycle rather than a demands-first product.
CaseFleet
Sales call for pricingSoftware you run yourself: review and annotate records, and your highlights build the chronology and visual timeline. Full-text search covers scanned and handwritten pages.
- Pricing:
- Subscription; 14-day free trial, no credit card
- Best for:
- Firms that want control over every chronology entry instead of a generated draft, including medical malpractice and insurance defense work.
Filevine
Sales call for pricingDemand letter generation and a medical record chronology tool built into the Filevine case management platform.
- Pricing:
- Bundled with Filevine; quote-based
- Best for:
- Firms already running Filevine that want demands and chronologies inside the system they use every day.
InPractice
Pricing publishedSelf-serve medical chronology software with per-page pricing and no subscription. Upload records, get a filterable chronology with OCR search.
- Pricing:
- From $0.05 per page, no subscription
- Best for:
- Low-volume firms priced out of platform contracts: pay only for the pages you process.
Legal Tank
Flat quote up frontNot software. A litigation support team drafts your medical chronology, record review, or demand letter as a finished, page-cited document, per matter.
- Pricing:
- Flat per-document quote, up front, no subscription
- Best for:
- Firms that want the finished work product without buying, learning, or supervising a platform. Nothing to implement and no seat licenses.
That is us. The comparison table below applies the same criteria to our service as to every vendor.
Vendor details reflect each company's publicly listed information as of August 2026 and may change. Confirm current terms on each vendor's site before purchase.
Platform vs software vs drafting service
The category you pick matters more than the vendor. Here is what each model asks of your firm.
Get a price without a sales call
InPractice publishes per-page pricing; others gate it
Flat rate card on request, no demo
Commitment required
Staff time to operate it
Output arrives page-cited and ready to serve
Every entry carries a record citation
Works at 2 to 5 demands a month
Works at 50+ demands a month
Common questions
The questions firms actually ask when they price this category.
Keep comparing
Related comparisons and the services this page keeps mentioning.