Attorney Review Option Available

Non-Solicitation Agreement Generator

Generate a professional non-solicitation agreement customized for your state. AI-powered with optional attorney review, covering all 50 U.S. jurisdictions.

Electronic Signature

Non-Solicitation Agreement Generator

AI-powered · Attorney review option · All 50 states

Attorney review available · Secure & encrypted

Signature Requirements

Electronic Signature

This non-solicitation agreement is fully enforceable with electronic signatures under the ESIGN Act and UETA. Both the company and employee must sign, and the employee must receive adequate consideration for the restrictions to be legally binding.

How Our Non-Solicitation Agreement Generator Works

1

Select Your State

Choose your state to apply non-solicitation agreement laws specific to your jurisdiction.

2

Enter Your Details

Provide the required information - party names, terms, and key provisions.

3

AI Generates Your Document

Our AI drafts a comprehensive non-solicitation agreement in seconds. Add attorney review for verified compliance.

4

Review & Download

Review your document, make edits, and download as PDF or DOCX. Or upgrade to attorney-drafted for full personalization.

What Is a Non-Solicitation Agreement?

A non-solicitation agreement is a restrictive covenant that prohibits an individual, typically a departing employee or contractor, from soliciting the company's clients, customers, or employees for a specified period after the end of the employment or business relationship. Unlike a non-compete agreement, which broadly restricts where someone can work, a non-solicitation agreement is narrowly focused on preventing the individual from using relationships and knowledge gained during their tenure to divert business or talent away from the former employer. This narrower scope generally makes non-solicitation agreements more likely to be enforced by courts compared to broader non-compete restrictions.

The enforceability of non-solicitation agreements varies significantly by state. California Business and Professions Code Section 16600 broadly prohibits agreements that restrain anyone from engaging in a lawful profession or business, and California courts have generally held that non-solicitation agreements restricting the solicitation of customers are void under this statute, though non-solicitation of employees may receive different treatment. At the federal level, the FTC non-compete rule issued in 2024 has created uncertainty about the future of restrictive covenants more broadly, though its applicability to non-solicitation agreements remains contested. Other states apply a reasonableness test, examining whether the restriction is necessary to protect legitimate business interests such as trade secrets, customer relationships, or goodwill.

Courts that enforce non-solicitation agreements require that they be reasonable in scope, duration, and geographic reach (if applicable). Most enforceable agreements cover a period of 12 to 24 months, though the appropriate duration depends on the nature of the business and the employee's role. The blue pencil doctrine, applied in many states, allows courts to modify overly broad restrictions rather than invalidating the entire agreement. Some jurisdictions require that the restriction be supported by independent consideration beyond at-will employment, meaning the employee must receive something of value (such as a signing bonus, promotion, or access to confidential information) in exchange for agreeing to the restriction. Garden leave provisions, which pay the employee their salary during the restriction period, significantly increase enforceability.

A well-drafted non-solicitation agreement should clearly define what constitutes "solicitation" and identify the specific categories of individuals or entities that cannot be solicited. Passive acceptance of business from former clients who initiate contact on their own is generally not considered solicitation, but the line between passive acceptance and active solicitation can be blurry. The agreement should also address whether it covers indirect solicitation through third parties, social media contact, and participation in general marketing activities that might reach restricted individuals. When combined with a non-compete agreement and confidentiality agreement, a non-solicitation agreement forms part of a comprehensive protection strategy for the employer's business interests.

Why You Need a Non-Solicitation Agreement

A senior salesperson or account manager with deep client relationships is leaving your company, and you need to prevent them from taking your clients to a competitor during the transition period.

You are hiring a new employee who will have access to your client list, pricing strategies, and account details, and you want to protect these business relationships with a contractual restriction signed at the time of hire.

A key employee is departing and you are negotiating a severance agreement that includes non-solicitation provisions as a condition of receiving enhanced severance benefits.

Your company is in a service industry where personal relationships between employees and clients are the primary driver of business retention, and you need to protect against client attrition when employees leave.

You want a more targeted alternative to a non-compete agreement that protects your client relationships without broadly restricting where the departing employee can work.

Key Sections in a Non-Solicitation Agreement

Definition of Solicitation

Precisely defines what conduct constitutes "solicitation," including direct outreach, indirect contact through third parties, and the use of social media or marketing channels. A clear definition prevents disputes about whether the restricted party's actions violated the agreement.

Restricted Individuals and Entities

Identifies the specific categories of clients, customers, prospects, and employees that the restricted party may not solicit. Many agreements limit the restriction to clients with whom the employee had direct contact or about whom they gained confidential knowledge during a specified lookback period.

Restriction Period

Specifies the duration of the non-solicitation restriction, which typically ranges from 12 to 24 months following the end of the employment or business relationship. Shorter periods are more likely to be enforced, and the duration should be proportional to the employee's role and access to sensitive information.

Consideration

Documents the value provided to the restricted party in exchange for agreeing to the restriction, such as initial employment, continued employment, a signing bonus, stock options, severance payments, or access to confidential information. Adequate consideration is essential for enforceability in many states.

Exceptions and Carve-Outs

Defines any exceptions to the solicitation restriction, such as passive acceptance of unsolicited inbound contact, responses to general advertising, or solicitation of individuals with whom the restricted party had a pre-existing relationship before joining the company.

Remedies for Breach

Specifies the consequences of violating the agreement, typically including injunctive relief, actual damages, liquidated damages, and recovery of attorneys' fees. Many agreements include an extension provision that adds any period of violation to the restriction duration.

Non-Solicitation Agreement Legal Requirements

California Business and Professions Code Section 16600 broadly voids agreements that restrain anyone from engaging in a lawful business, and California courts have generally treated employee non-solicitation of customers as unenforceable under this statute.

Many states require that non-solicitation agreements be supported by independent consideration beyond continued at-will employment, such as a signing bonus, promotion, or access to confidential information.

Courts apply a reasonableness test examining the restriction's duration, scope, and whether it is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest such as trade secrets, customer relationships, or goodwill.

The blue pencil doctrine, applied in many states, allows courts to modify unreasonable non-solicitation restrictions rather than voiding the entire agreement, but some states follow an "all or nothing" approach.

NLRA Section 7 protects employees' rights to engage in concerted activity, and non-solicitation agreements that could be interpreted as restricting employee organizing or union activity may violate federal labor law.

State-by-State Non-Solicitation Agreement Requirements

Non-Solicitation Agreement requirements vary significantly across U.S. states. Each jurisdiction imposes different rules regarding required language, notarization, witness requirements, filing procedures, and enforceability standards. Our generator automatically applies state-specific provisions to ensure your document complies with the laws of your jurisdiction.

Select your state in the generator above to see the specific requirements that apply to your non-solicitation agreement. Our database of state-specific legal provisions is maintained and updated by licensed attorneys.

View state-specific non-solicitation agreement templates

Common Non-Solicitation Agreement Mistakes to Avoid

Drafting the agreement with overly broad restrictions that cover all company clients rather than limiting the restriction to clients with whom the employee had a direct relationship, which increases the risk of unenforceability.

Failing to provide independent consideration beyond at-will employment in states that require it, rendering the agreement unenforceable from inception.

Attempting to enforce non-solicitation agreements in California or other states that broadly prohibit restrictive covenants without understanding the applicable state law limitations.

Not distinguishing between solicitation of clients and solicitation of employees, which are often subject to different legal standards and may require separate provisions.

Using identical non-solicitation terms for all employees regardless of their role and access to confidential information, which undermines the argument that the restriction is reasonably necessary to protect legitimate business interests.

Frequently Asked Questions About Non-Solicitation Agreements

What is a non-solicitation agreement?
A non-solicitation agreement is a restrictive covenant that prohibits a departing employee or contractor from soliciting the company's clients, customers, or employees for a specified period after the end of the relationship. It protects the company's business relationships and workforce stability without broadly restricting where the individual can work. Non-solicitation agreements are narrower than non-compete agreements and are generally considered more reasonable and enforceable by courts. They are commonly used for salespeople, account managers, executives, and anyone with significant client-facing responsibilities.
What is the difference between non-solicitation and non-compete?
A non-compete agreement broadly restricts where a departing individual can work, typically prohibiting them from working for competitors within a defined geographic area for a specified period. A non-solicitation agreement only restricts the individual from actively soliciting specific clients or employees, without limiting where they can work. A former employee bound by a non-solicitation agreement can work for a competitor but cannot actively pursue the former employer's clients. Because non-solicitation agreements are narrower in scope, they are generally more enforceable than non-competes, which many states have restricted or banned.
Are non-solicitation agreements enforceable?
Enforceability varies significantly by state. California generally does not enforce non-solicitation agreements restricting client solicitation under Business and Professions Code Section 16600. Most other states enforce non-solicitation agreements if they are reasonable in scope and duration, supported by adequate consideration, and necessary to protect legitimate business interests. Courts examine the specific restrictions, the employee's role, the duration, and whether the restriction is broader than necessary. Agreements limited to clients with whom the employee had a direct relationship and covering a 12 to 24 month period are most likely to be enforced.
How long can a non-solicitation agreement last?
Most enforceable non-solicitation agreements have restriction periods of 12 to 24 months, with 12 months being the most commonly upheld duration. Shorter periods are more likely to be enforced because courts view them as less burdensome on the individual's ability to earn a living. Restrictions beyond 24 months face increasing judicial skepticism and may be modified or invalidated. The appropriate duration depends on the nature of the business, the employee's role, and how quickly client relationships typically turn over in the industry.
Can you be fired for violating a non-solicitation agreement?
If you violate a non-solicitation agreement while still employed, you can be terminated for cause. If you violate the agreement after leaving employment, you cannot be "fired" but you can face significant legal consequences including injunctive relief (a court order to stop the solicitation), monetary damages for lost business, liquidated damages if specified in the agreement, and recovery of the employer's attorneys' fees. Many agreements also include a "tolling" provision that extends the restriction period by the duration of any violation, effectively lengthening the restriction.
What states ban non-solicitation agreements?
California is the most prominent state that broadly restricts non-solicitation agreements under Business and Professions Code Section 16600. Oklahoma, North Dakota, and Montana have similar statutes broadly limiting restrictive covenants. Several other states, including Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington, have enacted laws that restrict non-competes and may affect non-solicitation agreements depending on their scope and the employee's compensation level. The legal landscape is evolving rapidly, and the FTC's non-compete rule has created additional uncertainty. Employers should consult current state law before implementing non-solicitation restrictions.
What is the difference between non-solicitation and non-recruitment?
A non-solicitation agreement typically covers both client solicitation (preventing the individual from pursuing the company's customers) and employee solicitation (preventing them from recruiting the company's employees). A non-recruitment agreement focuses specifically on employee solicitation, prohibiting the individual from hiring or recruiting the company's employees. Non-recruitment restrictions are generally viewed more favorably by courts because they do not restrict the individual's ability to compete for business. Some companies use separate provisions for client non-solicitation and employee non-recruitment with different terms and restrictions for each.
Do non-solicitation agreements survive termination?
Yes, non-solicitation agreements are specifically designed to survive the termination of the employment or business relationship. The restriction period typically begins on the date employment ends, whether the termination was voluntary or involuntary. However, some states and courts have considered whether the circumstances of termination affect enforceability, particularly when the employee was terminated without cause. Well-drafted agreements include a provision explicitly stating that the restrictions survive termination regardless of the reason for separation, though enforceability may still depend on the specific facts and applicable state law.

More Legal Document Generators

Get a Professionally Drafted Non-Solicitation Agreement

Most clients choose our attorney-drafted option for a non-solicitation agreement fully customized to their situation by a licensed attorney. Need it fast? Our AI generator is a quick, affordable alternative.

On a budget? Download the free template or use the AI generator above for a quick, affordable option.

Attorney Review Available: Legal Tank documents are AI-generated with optional attorney review for verified compliance. For the highest level of assurance, choose our attorney-drafted service where a licensed attorney personally drafts your document. For complex or high-stakes legal matters, we recommend attorney-drafted documents or additional review by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Legal Tank is not a law firm and use of this platform does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Reviewed by licensed attorneys · Editorial policy · Last updated March 2026

Want a professionally drafted document instead?